三跑環評三謬誤 環保署須把關
2014-07-31 (轉載) 經濟日報 專欄: green forum
機場第三條機場跑道環評公眾諮詢結束，三跑的命運將先由環境諮詢委員討論，繼而由環保署發落。
整份環評中華白海豚無疑是討論焦點，皆因活生生的海豚生存與否，一眼看到，數字難以捏造，所以必須要提出海岸公園一類的補償措施。但空氣和噪音污染無色無相無味，將人折磨卻未致即死，即使被質疑「造數」，公眾亦難以證實。這是最危險之處，連緩減措施也不存在之時，公眾健康又何言得到保障呢？
機管局被指引舊數據 低估新跑道噪音問題
2014-07-25 蘋果日報
【蘋果日報報導】機管局早前公佈的機場第三跑道環評報告，被指低估噪音對馬灣、青衣、屯門等地居民的影響。荃灣區議員曾文典質疑機管局引用過時數據評估噪音，未能反映日後居民受高分貝噪音的影響。
Runway Plan Needs to Consider People's Health
South China Morning Post 24 June 2011
Edwin Lau urges airport officials to ensure that residents' well-being will not be further damaged
he Airport Authority says that preliminary information about the potential environmental and health impact of its proposal for a third runway at Hong Kong International Airport will be made available when the proposed expansion gets the nod. Only then will a detailed environmental impact assessment on air pollution, noise and marine habitat be conducted.
Edwin Lau urges airport officials to ensure that residents' well-being will not be further damaged
he Airport Authority says that preliminary information about the potential environmental and health impact of its proposal for a third runway at Hong Kong International Airport will be made available when the proposed expansion gets the nod. Only then will a detailed environmental impact assessment on air pollution, noise and marine habitat be conducted.
訂閱：
文章 (Atom)